HM Queen Elizabeth II
Predictions for 2009-2012
(extract from Paul Mayo’s talk notes published 2009-11-25)
With natal Saturn on her Midheaven (destiny-point) ruling her horoscope, HM Queen Elizabeth was astrologically as well as by birthright born to rule – a job she has done in exemplary fashion, providing stability to Britain and its associated Commonwealth countries, like a true Taurean, for over fifty years. But can British and Commonwealth citizens expect this to continue for ever? The Queen has certainly stated her intention to continue in the role as long as she is able. As she explained it: ‘I like being Queen’.
In Nov 2009, although we don’t know it (and won’t for a while yet) the Queen at 83 has been wondering how much longer she can continue to fulfil her duties.
She will have another bout of this uncertainty between Christmas 2009 and New Year, brought on by feeling a little unwell.
During 2010 this issue continues to haunt her thinking as she struggles to come to terms with her own decision. She will later refer to this as ‘having to take a painful decision’. Changes in her husband’s state of health will be a key factor.
The total eclipse on 11th July seems to highlight for the media & public the ability of the Queen to continue with her duties; at this stage just raising the question.
The Queen may decide before the end of 2010 (probably in Oct/Nov) when to step aside, most likely at the end of 2012.
29/Dec/2009
Love the website Paul. Are you planning to show a comparison of Prince Philip`s and Charles and/or William`s charts in terms of the Queen`s decision.
Also tuned into the military fashion for 2010/year of the metal tiger. It has already begun to creep in with the re emergence of trench coats and jackets with epaulettes and gold braid and buttons…see Cheryl Cole in her new video.
Look forward to more news here.
thanks a million
Ria xx
29/Dec/2009
Thanks, Ria. I’ve got loads of stuff I could put on – literally hundreds of pages. Just a question of time. I’ll see what people ask for. Yes, Sandra’s brother Simon has told us he tried to get a military surplus trench coat in the UK as it’s very cold where he’s working in Poland, but they had sold out.
Paul
25/Aug/2010
Paul, how would you describe the spirit of the age in which we live? Do you suppose that the upcoming New World Order or age of Aquarius represents a new historic cycle, which is concurrent with the Biblical concept of the Second Coming of Christ?
12/Jan/2011
Apologies for the long delay in replying Marcus. This is not an easy question to answer because it involves consideration of what might be quite different mindsets. By definition the Age of Aquarius is a new historic cycle, though the major features of such a cycle are likely to emerge so gradually that they are almost imperceptible to a single individual in the course of a single lifetime. The spirit of the present age could be described as a ‘quickening’ as various ‘higher forces’ working cooperatively within the minds of many people try to steer the planet’s future developments towards a more harmonious experience. Whether you call these inspiring higher forces ‘Christ’ or by some other name is, I’d say, a matter of individual preference. Labelling things according to the relatively narrow perspectives of a single religion might prove more divisive than unifying for the world, which would not be a desirable outcome. However, many otherwise very different philosophies and religions do concur in describing this time in world history as crucial, the beginning of a better Era.
15/Nov/2013
Lets hope it is a new era, the New World Order as I am aware are vested interests in banking, commerce, media, military, Big Pharma etc. Eugenics is involved via Agenda 21 and the spraying of persistent contrails aka chemtrails affecting our weather. Humanity is up against it. I agree though we are heading for better times as people’s awareness awakens to psychic information and their true identities.
3/Oct/2012
Paul, is it true that high-status people and world leaders, such as Queen Elizabeth II are generally more “evolved” than the ordinary person in the street?
I remember that you once said: “Margaret Thatcher is a highly evolved person”, which would suggest that anyone who is in a position of authority is likewise more evolved than ordinary people in this country, who mostly do not have the short-term capability or potential to rise to a prominent position in politics.
Would you say that your remark about Mrs Thatcher is entirely consistent with the Hindu concept of varna…and that any former head of state (or prime minister) such as Ronald Reagan, Margaret Thatcher, Helmut Kohl, Jacque Chirac, and Mikhail Gorbachev etc. would be spiritually on a par with the kshatriyas – The warrior & administrative caste e.g. Rajput, Maharajah & Moghul etc. which would be equivalent to colonial administrators of the British Empire – in India?
Consequently, is it true that any person who is elected to the most exalted office in US politics has all the necessary skills and attributes of a great leader (charisma, oratorical skills, social skills, political intuition, intellectual & academic prowess etc), which could only have been developed over the course of many lifetimes; and such an exalted position is compelling evidence that the incumbent has previous experience of a similar nature in the history of Classical Greek civilization, Ancient Rome, Medieval & Modern Europe?
8/Oct/2012
I can only give my opinion Thomas, which is that it would not be appropriate to draw such sweeping conclusions. Some leaders (such as Obama in my opinion) are considerably more evolved than most people. Other leaders – far too many of them – are either no more evolved than the average person; or not evolved enough to do the job in the best interests of all; or (potentially much more damaging) were more evolved but have fallen back and operate by values that should long have been superseded by them. This applies not just to countries but to businesses and other organisations of influence.